11. Detailing the evaluation strategy

Table of contents

  1. 11.1 Any regulatory response to organised crime infiltration should be periodically evaluated to determine whether the nature and extent of the risk factors for infiltration have changed, and whether the regulatory objectives are being achieved. A regulatory response may require modification in response to this evaluation.
  2. 11.2 As the Victorian Guide to Regulation observes, an evaluation strategy should be designed at the outset of a regulatory response so that appropriate data can be collected during the implementation phase for the purpose of evaluation.1
  3. 11.3 Consultation with occupation and industry members should be a priority for any evaluation strategy. Just as industry collaboration is important when developing a regulatory response, it is equally important that industry contribute to the evaluation of that response. Occupation/industry members may have unique insights into the operation of regulatory strategies in practice (including the existence of any perverse incentives for organised crime infiltration), barriers to the engagement of occupation/industry members in regulation, the utility and scope of enforcement action, and the degree to which organised crime infiltration has receded or increased following the implementation of the regulatory response.
  4. 11.4 An evaluation strategy should also involve inter-agency consultation to determine whether organised crime groups have been displaced to other occupations or industries within Victoria, or to other states or territories. Where displacement has occurred, consideration should be given to whether the level of regulatory intervention needs to be reduced in one industry and increased in another.
  5. 11.5 In addition, the evaluation of a regulatory regime should seek to ascertain the extent to which an occupation or industry has matured and engages in self-regulation. Less regulatory intervention may be warranted where occupation/industry members are acting as effective ‘guardians’ against organised crime infiltration (through, for example, a strong professional association), or where the occupation/industry has become more profitable and members are less susceptible to corruption by organised crime groups.

 


Footnotes

Main menu

Back to top